Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study | Nature Medicine
HomeHome > Blog > Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study | Nature Medicine

Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study | Nature Medicine

Jul 01, 2025

Nature Medicine (2025)Cite this article

Previous research suggests detrimental health effects associated with consuming processed foods, including processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and trans fatty acids (TFAs). However, systematic characterization of the dose–response relationships between these foods and health outcomes is limited. Here, using Burden of Proof meta-regression methods, we evaluated the associations between processed meat, SSBs and TFAs and three chronic diseases: type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease (IHD) and colorectal cancer. We conservatively estimated that—relative to zero consumption—consuming processed meat (at 0.6–57 g d−1) was associated with at least an 11% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 7% (at 0.78–55 g d−1) increase in colorectal cancer risk. SSB intake (at 1.5–390 g d−1) was associated with at least an 8% average increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 2% (at 0–365 g d−1) increase in IHD risk. TFA consumption (at 0.25–2.56% of daily energy intake) was associated with at least a 3% average increase in IHD risk. These associations each received two-star ratings reflecting weak relationships or inconsistent input evidence, highlighting both the need for further research and—given the high burden of these chronic diseases—the merit of continuing to recommend limiting consumption of these foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$32.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

The findings of this study were based on data from public repositories and published literature, with systematic searches conducted in PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), Embase (https://www.embase.com) and Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com) using the search strings provided in Supplementary Information. The estimates produced in this study are accessible via the Burden of Proof visualization tool (https://vizhub.healthdata.org/burden-of-proof/). The relevant studies were identified through a systematic literature review, and citations for all input studies are listed in the main text as references27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103. Study characteristics for all input data used in the analyses are also provided in Supplementary Table 5. The template for the data collection form is provided in Supplementary Table 4.

This study was a secondary analysis of existing data obtained through systematic reviews using meta-analytic methods. The study did not involve primary data collection, randomization, blinding or determination of sample size. Analyses were carried out using R version 4.0.5 and Python version 3.10.9. Code used for data processing (https://github.com/ihmeuw-msca/burden-of-proof/tree/main/risks/processed_foods) and for running the Burden of Proof models (https://github.com/ihmeuw-msca/bopforge) is publicly available online.

Monteiro, C. A. et al. Ultra-processed foods: what they are and how to identify them. Public Health Nutr. 22, 936–941 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lane, M. M. et al. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. Br. Med. J. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-077310 (2024).

Mendoza, K. et al. Ultra-processed foods and cardiovascular disease: analysis of three large US prospective cohorts and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Lancet Reg. Health Am. 37, 100859 (2024).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Srour, B. et al. Ultra-processed food intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study (NutriNet-Santé). Br. Med. J. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l1451 (2019).

Brauer, M. et al. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2162–2203 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Deveci, G. & Tek, N. A. N-Nitrosamines: a potential hazard in processed meat products. J. Sci. Food Agric. 104, 2551–2560 (2024).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lee, J.-G. et al. Effects of grilling procedures on levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in grilled meats. Food Chem. 199, 632–638 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zheng, W. & Lee, S.-A. Well-done meat intake, heterocyclic amine exposure, and cancer risk. Nutr. Cancer 61, 437–446 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

López-Hernández, L. et al. Identifying predictors of the visceral fat index in the obese and overweight population to manage obesity: a randomized intervention study. Obes. Facts 13, 403–414 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Huang, Y. et al. Associations of visceral adipose tissue, circulating protein biomarkers, and risk of cardiovascular diseases: a Mendelian randomization analysis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 840866 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Marques, M. D. et al. Relation between visceral fat and coronary artery disease evaluated by multidetector computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 209, 481–486 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Oostindjer, M. et al. The role of red and processed meat in colorectal cancer development: a perspective. Meat Sci. 97, 583–596 (2014).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Bellamri, M., Walmsley, S. J. & Turesky, R. J. Metabolism and biomarkers of heterocyclic aromatic amines in humans. Genes Environ. 43, 29 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lala, P. K. & Chakraborty, C. Role of nitric oxide in carcinogenesis and tumour progression. Lancet Oncol. 2, 149–156 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Moorthy, B., Chu, C. & Carlin, D. J. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: from metabolism to lung cancer. Toxicol. Sci. 145, 5–15 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rao, C. V. Nitric oxide signaling in colon cancer chemoprevention. Mutat. Res. 555, 107–119 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sánchez-Pimienta, T. G., Batis, C., Lutter, C. K. & Rivera, J. A. Sugar-sweetened beverages are the main sources of added sugar intake in the Mexican population. J. Nutr. 146, 1888S–1896S (2016).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Vartanian, L. R., Schwartz, M. B. & Brownell, K. D. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Public Health 97, 667–675 (2007).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lara-Castor, L. et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage intakes among adults between 1990 and 2018 in 185 countries. Nat. Commun. 14, 5957 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Stender, S., Astrup, A. & Dyerberg, J. Ruminant and industrially produced trans fatty acids: health aspects. Food Nutr. Res. 52, 1651 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Mozaffarian, D. et al. Dietary intake of trans fatty acids and systemic inflammation in women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 79, 606–612 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bendsen, N. T., Christensen, R., Bartels, E. M. & Astrup, A. Consumption of industrial and ruminant trans fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 65, 773–783 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Mozaffarian, D., Katan, M. B., Ascherio, A., Stampfer, M. J. & Willett, W. C. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 1601–1613 (2006).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Naghavi, M. et al. Global burden of 288 causes of death and life expectancy decomposition in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2100–2132 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Zheng, P. et al. The Burden of Proof studies: assessing the evidence of risk. Nat. Med. 28, 2038–2044 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Page, M. J. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br. Med. J. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 (2021).

Ericson, U. et al. Food sources of fat may clarify the inconsistent role of dietary fat intake for incidence of type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 101, 1065–1080 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fretts, A. M. et al. Associations of processed meat and unprocessed red meat intake with incident diabetes: the Strong Heart Family Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 95, 752–758 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Gu, X. et al. Red meat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in a prospective cohort study of United States females and males. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 118, 1153–1163 (2023).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kurotani, K. et al. Red meat consumption is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in men but not in women: a Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Br. J. Nutr. 110, 1910–1918 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lajous, M. et al. Processed and unprocessed red meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes among French women. Diabetes Care 35, 128–130 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Liu, M. et al. Quantity and variety of food groups consumption and the risk of diabetes in adults: a prospective cohort study. Clin. Nutr. 40, 5710–5717 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Männistö, S., Kontto, J., Kataja-Tuomola, M., Albanes, D. & Virtamo, J. High processed meat consumption is a risk factor of type 2 diabetes in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention study. Br. J. Nutr. 103, 1817–1822 (2010).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mari-Sanchis, A. et al. Meat consumption and risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the SUN project: a highly educated middle-class population. PLoS ONE 11, e0157990 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Montonen, J. et al. Food consumption and the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, 441–448 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Papier, K. et al. Meat consumption and risk of 25 common conditions: outcome-wide analyses in 475,000 men and women in the UK Biobank study. BMC Med. 19, 53 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Son, J., Lee, Y. & Park, K. Effects of processed red meat consumption on the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases among Korean adults: the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Eur. J. Nutr. 58, 2477–2484 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Song, Y., Manson, J. E., Buring, J. E. & Liu, S. A prospective study of red meat consumption and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women. Diabetes Care 27, 2108–2115 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Steinbrecher, A., Erber, E., Grandinetti, A., Kolonel, L. & Maskarinec, G. Meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: the Multiethnic Cohort. Public Health Nutr. 14, 568–574 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Van Woudenbergh, G. J. et al. Meat consumption and its association with C-reactive protein and incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35, 1499–1505 (2012).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Villegas, R. et al. The association of meat intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes may be modified by body weight. Int. J. Med. Sci. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.3.152 (2006).

The InterAct Consortium. Association between dietary meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetologia 56, 47–59 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Al-Shaar, L. et al. Red meat intake and risk of coronary heart disease among US men: prospective cohort study. BMJ https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4141 (2020).

Bernstein, A. M. et al. Major dietary protein sources and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Circulation 122, 876–883 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Burke, V. et al. Health-related behaviours as predictors of mortality and morbidity in Australian Aborigines. Prev. Med. 44, 135–142 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Haring, B. et al. Dietary protein intake and coronary heart disease in a large community based cohort: results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. PLoS ONE 9, e109552 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Iqbal, R. et al. Associations of unprocessed and processed meat intake with mortality and cardiovascular disease in 21 countries [Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study]: a prospective cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 114, 1049–1058 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Key, T. J. et al. Consumption of meat, fish, dairy products, and eggs and risk of ischemic heart disease: a prospective study of 7198 incident cases among 409 885 participants in the Pan-European EPIC Cohort. Circulation 139, 2835–2845 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Møller, S. P., Mejborn, H., Christensen, A. I., Biltoft-Jensen, A. & Thygesen, L. C. Meat consumption, stratified by dietary quality, and risk of heart disease. Br. J. Nutr. 126, 1881–1887 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Nagao, M. et al. Meat consumption in relation to mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese men and women. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 66, 687–693 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Saito, E. et al. Association between meat intake and mortality due to all-cause and major causes of death in a Japanese population. PLoS ONE 15, e0244007 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Whiteman, D., Muir, J., Jones, L., Murphy, M. & Key, T. Dietary questions as determinants of mortality: the OXCHECK experience. Public Health Nutr. 2, 477–487 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bernstein, A. M. et al. Processed and unprocessed red meat and risk of colorectal cancer: analysis by tumor location and modification by time. PLoS ONE 10, e0135959 (2015).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bostick, R. M. et al. Sugar, meat, and fat intake, and non-dietary risk factors for colon cancer incidence in Iowa women (United States). Cancer Causes Control 5, 38–52 (1994).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Chao, A. Meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA 293, 172 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Cross, A. J. et al. A large prospective study of meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: an investigation of potential mechanisms underlying this association. Cancer Res. 70, 2406–2414 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

English, D. R. et al. Red meat, chicken, and fish consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 13, 1509–1514 (2004).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Etemadi, A. et al. Anatomical subsite can modify the association between meat and meat compounds and risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma: findings from three large US cohorts. Int. J. Cancer 143, 2261–2270 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Flood, A. Meat, fat, and their subtypes as risk factors for colorectal cancer in a prospective cohort of women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 158, 59–68 (2003).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Gilsing, A. M. J. et al. Vegetarianism, low meat consumption and the risk of colorectal cancer in a population based cohort study. Sci. Rep. 5, 13484 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Islam, Z. et al. Meat subtypes and colorectal cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 6 cohort studies in Japan. Cancer Sci. 110, 3603–3614 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Knuppel, A. et al. Meat intake and cancer risk: prospective analyses in UK Biobank. Int. J. Epidemiol. 49, 1540–1552 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Larsson, S. C., Rafter, J., Holmberg, L., Bergkvist, L. & Wolk, A. Red meat consumption and risk of cancers of the proximal colon, distal colon and rectum: the Swedish Mammography Cohort. Int. J. Cancer 113, 829–834 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lin, J. Dietary fat and fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 160, 1011–1022 (2004).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Mehta, S. S. et al. A prospective analysis of red and processed meat consumption and risk of colorectal cancer in women. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 29, 141–150 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Mejborn, H., Møller, S. P., Thygesen, L. C. & Biltoft-Jensen, A. Dietary intake of red meat, processed meat, and poultry and risk of colorectal cancer and all-cause mortality in the context of dietary guideline compliance. Nutrients 13, 32 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Norat, T. et al. Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: the European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 97, 906–916 (2005).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Ollberding, N. J., Wilkens, L. R., Henderson, B. E., Kolonel, L. N. & Le Marchand, L. Meat consumption, heterocyclic amines and colorectal cancer risk: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Int. J. Cancer 131, E1125–E1133 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, D. E. et al. Combinations of modifiable lifestyle behaviours in relation to colorectal cancer risk in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project. Sci. Rep. 10, 20561 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pietinen, P. et al. Diet and risk of colorectal cancer in a cohort of Finnish men. Cancer Causes Control 10, 387–396 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bhupathiraju, S. N. et al. Caffeinated and caffeine-free beverages and risk of type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 155–166 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dhingra, R. et al. Soft drink consumption and risk of developing cardiometabolic risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged adults in the community. Circulation 116, 480–488 (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Eshak, E. S. et al. Soft drink, 100% fruit juice, and vegetable juice intakes and risk of diabetes mellitus. Clin. Nutr. 32, 300–308 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fagherazzi, G. et al. Consumption of artificially and sugar-sweetened beverages and incident type 2 diabetes in the Etude Epidemiologique aupres des femmes de la Mutuelle Generale de l’Education Nationale-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 517–523 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gardener, H., Moon, Y. P., Rundek, T., Elkind, M. S. V. & Sacco, R. L. Diet soda and sugar-sweetened soda consumption in relation to incident diabetes in the Northern Manhattan Study. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2, nzy008 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hirahatake, K. M. et al. Cumulative intake of artificially sweetened and sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of incident type 2 diabetes in young adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development In Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 110, 733–741 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Huang, M. et al. Artificially sweetened beverages, sugar-sweetened beverages, plain water, and incident diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women: the prospective Women’s Health Initiative observational study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 106, 614–622 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Montonen, J., Järvinen, R., Knekt, P., Heliövaara, M. & Reunanen, A. Consumption of sweetened beverages and intakes of fructose and glucose predict type 2 diabetes occurrence. J. Nutr. 137, 1447–1454 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

O’Connor, L. et al. Prospective associations and population impact of sweet beverage intake and type 2 diabetes, and effects of substitutions with alternative beverages. Diabetologia 58, 1474–1483 (2015).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Odegaard, A. O., Koh, W.-P., Arakawa, K., Yu, M. C. & Pereira, M. A. Soft drink and juice consumption and risk of physician-diagnosed incident type 2 diabetes: the Singapore Chinese Health Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 171, 701–708 (2010).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Palmer, J. R. et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in African American women. Arch. Intern. Med. 168, 1487–1492 (2008).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pan, A. et al. Plain-water intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in young and middle-aged women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 95, 1454–1460 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Papier, K. et al. Consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and type 2 diabetes incidence in Thai adults: results from an 8-year prospective study. Nutr. Diabetes 7, e283 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Paynter, N. P. et al. Coffee and sweetened beverage consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 164, 1075–1084 (2006).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Sakurai, M. et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage and diet soda consumption and the 7-year risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged Japanese men. Eur. J. Nutr. 53, 251–258 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Siqueira, J. H. et al. Consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and risk of metabolic syndrome and its components: results of the ELSA-Brasil study (2008–2010 and 2012–2014). J. Endocrinol. Invest. 46, 159–171 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Torres-Ibarra, L. et al. Regular consumption of soft drinks is associated with type 2 diabetes incidence in Mexican adults: findings from a prospective cohort study. Nutr. J. 19, 126 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Viana Dias, J. P. et al. Consumption of sweetened beverages is associated with the incidence of type 2 diabetes in Brazilian adults (CUME project). Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 33, 789–796 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

The InterAct consortium. Consumption of sweet beverages and type 2 diabetes incidence in European adults: results from EPIC-InterAct. Diabetologia 56, 1520–1530 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Eshak, E. S. et al. Soft drink intake in relation to incident ischemic heart disease, stroke, and stroke subtypes in Japanese men and women: the Japan Public Health Centre-based study cohort I. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 96, 1390–1397 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Warfa, K., Drake, I., Wallström, P., Engström, G. & Sonestedt, E. Association between sucrose intake and acute coronary event risk and effect modification by lifestyle factors: Malmö Diet and Cancer Cohort Study. Br. J. Nutr. 116, 1611–1620 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pacheco, L. S. et al. Sugar-sweetened beverage intake and cardiovascular disease risk in the California Teachers Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e014883 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Collin, L. J., Judd, S., Safford, M., Vaccarino, V. & Welsh, J. A. Association of sugary beverage consumption with mortality risk in US adults: a secondary analysis of data from the REGARDS Study. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e193121 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yang, B. et al. Added sugar, sugar-sweetened beverages, and artificially sweetened beverages and risk of cardiovascular disease: findings from the Women’s Health Initiative and a network meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrients 14, 4226 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mullee, A. et al. Association between soft drink consumption and mortality in 10 European countries. JAMA Intern. Med. 179, 1479–1490 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Keller, A. et al. Substitution of sugar-sweetened beverages for other beverages and the risk of developing coronary heart disease: results from the Harvard Pooling Project of Diet and Coronary Disease. Prev. Med. 131, 105970 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Pacheco, L. S. et al. Sugar- or artificially-sweetened beverage consumption, physical activity, and risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.17.23288711 (2023).

Laake, I. et al. A prospective study of intake of trans-fatty acids from ruminant fat, partially hydrogenated vegetable oils, and marine oils and mortality from CVD. Br. J. Nutr. 108, 743–754 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, Y. et al. Saturated fats compared with unsaturated fats and sources of carbohydrates in relation to risk of coronary heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66, 1538–1548 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Oomen, C. M. et al. Association between trans fatty acid intake and 10-year risk of coronary heart disease in the Zutphen Elderly Study: a prospective population-based study. Lancet 357, 746–751 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pietinen, P. et al. Intake of fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease in a cohort of Finnish men. the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 145, 876–887 (1997).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Virtanen, J. K., Mursu, J., Tuomainen, T.-P. & Voutilainen, S. Dietary fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease in men: the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34, 2679–2687 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Xu, J. et al. Dietary fat intake and risk of coronary heart disease: the Strong Heart Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84, 894–902 (2006).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Bouvard, V. et al. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat. Lancet Oncol. 16, 1599–1600 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Stern, M. C. et al. Genome-wide gene–environment interaction analyses to understand the relationship between red meat and processed meat intake and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 33, 400–410 (2024).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

WHO Manual on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxation Policies to Promote Healthy Diets (World Health Organization, 2022).

Andreyeva, T., Marple, K., Marinello, S., Moore, T. E. & Powell, L. M. Outcomes following taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2215276 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

World Health Organization Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children (WHO Department of Nutrition for Health and Development (NHD), 2015).

Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025 9th edn (US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services, 2020).

Countdown to 2023: WHO 5-Year Milestone Report on Global Trans Fat Elimination 2023 (World Health Organization, 2024).

Freedman, L. S., Schatzkin, A., Midthune, D. & Kipnis, V. Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 103, 1086–1092 (2011).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kipnis, V. et al. Effect of measurement error on energy-adjustment models in nutritional epidemiology. Am. J. Epidemiol. 146, 842–855 (1997).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dahm, C. C. Correcting measurement error in dietary exposure assessments: no piece of cake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 112, 11–12 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

McCullough, L. E. & Byrd, D. A. Total energy intake: implications for epidemiologic analyses. Am. J. Epidemiol. 192, 1801–1805 (2023).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Willett, W. C., Howe, G. R. & Kushi, L. H. Adjustment for total energy intake in epidemiologic studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 65, 1220S–1228S (1997).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Day, N. E. et al. Correlated measurement error—implications for nutritional epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 33, 1373–1381 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

GBD 2021 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 403, 2133–2161 (2024).

Article Google Scholar

Kassem, H. et al. Investigation and assessment of AI’s role in nutrition—an updated narrative review of the evidence. Nutrients 17, 190 (2025).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zheng, J., Wang, J., Shen, J. & An, R. Artificial intelligence applications to measure food and nutrient intakes: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 26, e54557 (2024).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lo, F. P.-W. et al. AI-enabled wearable cameras for assisting dietary assessment in African populations. npj Digit. Med. 7, 356 (2024).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Burgess, S., Foley, C. N., Allara, E., Staley, J. R. & Howson, J. M. M. A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants. Nat. Commun. 11, 376 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lai, W., Li, G., Peng, D., Li, N. & Wang, W. Mendelian randomization study reveals the relationship between dietary factors and respiratory diseases. Sci. Rep. 13, 22601 (2023).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Lescinsky, H. et al. Health effects associated with consumption of unprocessed red meat: a Burden of Proof study. Nat. Med. 28, 2075–2082 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Stanaway, J. D. et al. Health effects associated with vegetable consumption: a Burden of Proof study. Nat. Med. 28, 2066–2074 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Stevens, G. A. et al. Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting: the GATHER statement. Lancet 388, e19–e23 (2016).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Pan, A. et al. Red meat consumption and mortality: results from 2 prospective cohort studies. Arch. Intern. Med. 172, 555–563 (2012).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

de Souza, R. J. et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Br. Med. J. 351, h3978 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Zhang, Y.-B., Jiang, Y.-W., Chen, J.-X., Xia, P.-F. & Pan, A. Association of consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages or artificially sweetened beverages with mortality: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Adv. Nutr. 12, 374–383 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zheng, P., Barber, R., Sorensen, R. J. D., Murray, C. J. L. & Aravkin, A. Y. Trimmed constrained mixed effects models: formulations and algorithms. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 30, 544–556 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Download references

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Gates Foundation (OPP1152504). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the final report, or the decision to publish.

Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Demewoz Haile, Kassandra L. Harding, Susan A. McLaughlin, Charlie Ashbaugh, Vanessa Garcia, Nora M. Gilbertson, Hewan Kifle, Marie C. Parent, Reed J. D. Sorensen, Simon I. Hay, Aleksandr Y. Aravkin, Peng Zheng, Jeffrey D. Stanaway, Christopher J. L. Murray & Michael Brauer

Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Nora M. Gilbertson, Marie C. Parent, Simon I. Hay, Peng Zheng, Jeffrey D. Stanaway & Christopher J. L. Murray

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Aleksandr Y. Aravkin

School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Michael Brauer

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

D.H., S.I.H., M.B., C.A. and J.D.S. managed the estimation or publications process. D.H., K.L.H. and C.J.L.M. wrote the first draft of the paper. D.H. had primary responsibility for applying analytical methods to produce estimates. D.H. and H.K. had primary responsibility for seeking, cataloging, extracting or cleaning data and designing or coding figures and tables. D.H., V.G., M.C.P, R.J.D.S., J.D.S. and C.J.L.M. provided data or critical feedback on data sources. D.H., R.J.D.S., P.Z., N.M.G. and A.Y.A. developed methods or computational machinery. D.H., K.L.H., V.G., A.Y.A., J.D.S., M.B. and S.I.H. provided critical feedback on methods or results. D.H., K.L.H., S.A.M. C.J.L.M. and M.B. drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content. D.H., C.A. and S.I.H. managed the overall research enterprise.

Correspondence to Demewoz Haile.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Medicine thanks Yan-Bo Zhang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Ming Yang, in collaboration with the Nature Medicine team.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Template is from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.

Template is from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.

Template is from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.

Template is from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.

Template is from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.

Template is from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. 10.1136/bmj.n71. For more information, visit: http://www.prisma-statement.org/.

The panels show the log(relative risk) function, the relative risk function, and a modified funnel plot showing the residuals (relative to 0) on the x-axis and the estimated standard error that includes the reported standard error and between-study heterogeneity on the y-axis. RR relative risk, UI uncertainty interval.

The panels show the log(relative risk) function, the relative risk function, and a modified funnel plot showing the residuals (relative to 0) on the x-axis and the estimated standard error that includes the reported standard error and between-study heterogeneity on the y-axis. RR relative risk, UI uncertainty.

The panels show the log(relative risk) function, the relative risk function, and a modified funnel plot showing the residuals (relative to 0) on the x-axis and the estimated standard error that includes the reported standard error and between-study heterogeneity on the y-axis. RR relative risk, UI uncertainty interval.

Supplementary Methods, Data sources, Results and Tables 1–17.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

Haile, D., Harding, K.L., McLaughlin, S.A. et al. Health effects associated with consumption of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids: a Burden of Proof study. Nat Med (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03775-8

Download citation

Received: 01 November 2024

Accepted: 16 May 2025

Published: 30 June 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03775-8

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative